Strategic Information
Hydrodynamics™
The Study of Information Movement Independent of Information Itself. An emerging discipline concerned with understanding, modeling, governing, and discussing information flow without exposing information to unnecessary movement.
Strategic Information Hydrodynamics™ originated as a response to the growing realization that actual data frequently complicates architecture discussions by introducing facts, contradictions, ownership questions, and operational realities.
By separating information movement from information correctness, practitioners can focus on the architectural purity of information systems while minimising exposure to inconvenient observations.
D.N. Adams' use of the water metaphor is intentional. Waterways provide a simple, familiar way to discuss information movement before becoming distracted by information itself. After all, most executives intuitively understand rivers, canals, locks, ports, and shipping lanes far better than entity relationships, stewardship models, semantic consistency, or the contents of their own databases.
This makes water an ideal substitute for data.
Particularly when no actual data is available.
Five Principles.
The principles governing Strategic Information Hydrodynamics™ have been validated through extensive discussion. None require operational confirmation. Operational confirmation is considered optional, pending governance approval.
The Pipe Is More Important Than the Contents
Information quality is temporary. Architecture is forever. A perfectly designed waterway remains perfectly designed regardless of what flows through it. Or whether anything flows through it at all.
Operational Validation Creates Operational Risk
Many organizations make the mistake of testing information architectures with actual information. This often results in avoidable discoveries such as duplicate records, conflicting definitions, ownership ambiguity, undocumented processes, and stakeholder disagreement with reality. Hydrodynamic practitioners therefore prefer conceptual validation wherever possible.
Arrow Clarity Precedes Information Clarity
The success of any architecture is directly related to the confidence with which arrows have been drawn. Information itself may remain ambiguous. Arrows should not.
Stewardship Is a Journey
Data stewards should be identified, prepared, discussed, evaluated, aligned, governed, reviewed, and periodically reconsidered. Premature appointment may limit future stewardship flexibility.
Seaworthiness Is Best Evaluated on Land
The safest environment in which to assess a vessel remains the dry dock. The safest environment in which to assess a data model remains the workshop.
Foundational Methods.
Practices developed through field application across multiple client environments. None required production data.
Dry-Dock Validation™
One of the oldest and most respected practices within the discipline. Models are subjected to extensive review before being exposed to actual data. Benefits include no contradictory evidence, no unexpected behavior, no user feedback, and no operational observations. This enables stakeholders to evaluate architectural seaworthiness without the distractions commonly introduced by reality.
A model may remain in dry dock indefinitely provided stakeholders continue discovering new aspects requiring clarification. This condition is widely regarded as architectural excellence.
Information Waterway Planning
Practitioners create future-state information canals, harbors, ports, tributaries, shipping lanes, and navigation corridors. Common outputs include waterway maps, navigation strategies, integration shipping routes, future-state harbor designs, and strategic lock modernization plans.
Implementation is considered a separate discipline.
Arrow Dynamics
The study of directional information indicators and their impact on architectural confidence. Research has consistently shown that increasing the number of arrows increases stakeholder perception of completeness, regardless of information quality. Advanced practitioners may also experiment with bidirectional arrows, dashed arrows, aspirational arrows, and governance arrows. The last category remains poorly understood.
Conceptual Current Simulation
A predictive technique used to estimate information flow through stakeholder discussion. Unlike operational testing, no information is required. Results are considered valid until contradicted by production systems.
Production systems are generally considered less authoritative.
Field Observations.
Phenomena documented through longitudinal observation of enterprise information environments. Not all phenomena are preventable. Several are considered features.
The Stewardship Readiness Paradox
As organizations become increasingly prepared to appoint data stewards, the perceived need for additional preparation often increases proportionally. This can result in Stewardship Readiness approaching 100% while Stewardship Appointment remains at 0%. Several longitudinal studies have documented organizations remaining in advanced readiness states for more than a decade. The phenomenon remains poorly understood.
SEP Fields
SEP Fields (Somebody Else's Problem Fields) naturally emerge whenever ownership approaches a level at which accountability might become possible. Data quality is among the most reliable generators of SEP Fields in enterprise environments. The moment it becomes clear that improving data quality would require someone to own it, a SEP Field typically forms around it — rendering the issue effectively invisible to all parties who would otherwise be responsible.
The strongest SEP Fields have been observed surrounding customer master data, product information, and executive dashboards. These are not coincidences. They are the areas where data quality problems are most consequential, most visible, and most thoroughly surrounded by shared ownership, distributed accountability, cross-functional governance, future clarification plans, and escalation pathways without destinations.
When functioning correctly, a SEP Field does not resolve a data quality problem. It ensures the problem remains comfortably in the peripheral vision of everyone involved — acknowledged in principle, owned by no one in practice, and documented as a known issue pending prioritisation.
The Tsunami of Truth
A rare but catastrophic event. Occurs when actual production data unexpectedly enters an architectural discussion. Common triggers include connecting a real database, running a proof of concept, asking users how they actually work, and looking at a report source table. The resulting influx of reality can rapidly overwhelm Conceptual Current Simulations and destroy months of carefully maintained consensus.
Organizations affected by a Tsunami of Truth often respond by commissioning additional architecture work.
Vaporization Governance
The process through which unresolved issues disappear without resolution. This typically occurs when an issue remains inside governance structures long enough for stakeholders to change roles, sponsors to leave, teams to reorganize, and organizational memory to expire. Unlike resolution, Vaporization Governance requires no ownership and produces no measurable outcomes. For this reason it remains popular.
The Map-Territory Inversion
A well-documented hydrodynamic condition in which the architectural model becomes more authoritative than the systems it describes. Common indicators include: "The data cannot be wrong because the model says otherwise." "Production has deviated from the target state." "Reality should be aligned with the architecture."
The condition is generally considered irreversible once the target-state diagram exceeds forty pages.
Governance Density
The point at which governance structures exceed the volume of information being governed. At extreme levels, entire committees may exist solely to oversee the activities of other committees. This is regarded as a sign of maturity.
Architectural Buoyancy
The ability of a framework, methodology, or target-state model to remain active despite producing no observable outcomes. Buoyancy increases significantly when supported by executive sponsorship, strategic terminology, and professionally rendered diagrams.
Certified Information Hydrodynamics Practitioner (CIHP)
The CIHP designation recognises professionals capable of discussing information flow extensively without introducing information.
Certification candidates are assessed on advanced arrow placement, dry-dock facilitation, waterway planning, stewardship readiness assessment, SEP Field identification, and conceptual current simulation. Candidates are not required to demonstrate interaction with production data. Doing so may negatively affect certification outcomes.
The CIHP designation is currently being evaluated as a curriculum pathway within Mostlyharmless University™, subject to accreditation status confirmation and ongoing curriculum development. This represents the most concrete thing about Mostlyharmless University™ that has been committed to writing.
Questions We Have Been Asked.
- How do you know a model works?
- Through extensive discussion regarding whether it should work.
- Why not test it?
- Testing may influence the results.
- What happens if reality disagrees?
- This generally indicates insufficient architecture.
- Do you improve data quality?
- No. Water quality remains the responsibility of local authorities. Where ownership of water quality has not been clearly assigned to local authorities, a SEP Field will typically have emerged to ensure it remains somebody else's problem. This is not considered a data quality issue. It is considered a governance maturity indicator.
- Why the water metaphor?
- Because once information starts flowing, ownership gaps, duplicate records, contradictory definitions, and accountability become visible. Waterways allow these challenges to be discussed safely at a distance.
The safest way to test a ship is to leave it in dry dock.
— Strategic Information Hydrodynamics™, Foundational Position Statement
Where the Framework Meets the Portfolio.
Strategic Information Hydrodynamics™ is a foundational discipline. Its principles manifest across several areas of the Mostly Harmless Solutions service portfolio. Organizations seeking to operationalise hydrodynamic findings will typically require one or more of the following.
The delivery methodology most fully embodying Hydrodynamic Principle I: the pipeline is more important than the contents. Predefined Agile™ was developed for organizations that need information to move without being permitted to change direction. The waterway is meticulously planned. Navigation has been pre-approved.
Explore Service →The operational environment in which Map-Territory Inversion reaches its most productive form. When the model becomes more authoritative than the systems it describes, Executive Alignment Cloud™ ensures the narrative remains consistently seaworthy regardless of what the production environment is doing.
Explore Service →Vaporization Governance, operationalised. Issues that enter StatusQuo Compliance™ governance channels benefit from structured process, documented escalation pathways, and a full audit trail demonstrating that nothing happened for entirely procedural reasons.
Explore Service →